-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Updating the CONTRIBUTING.md file to include #expensify-bugs guidance #12373
Conversation
- Updated all guidance to embody the new world of Bug vs New Feature - Added guidance on #expensify-bug channel - Cleaned up various verbiage as I went for the sake of clarity
Hold on this please - need to get other changes ready before this is deployed to the production file. |
Sure, just ping me when it's ready for review 👍 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Line 28: For discussing the difference of use-case behind each room, it isn't clear if discussing issues around bugs would be in the bug channel or the open source channel since it says it's only for reporting.
Line 49: A job may be fixing a bug or working on a new feature. (take it or leave it, I just think that sounds better)
Line 55: is the identifying bug payment only if they propose a solution? I thought not. Also, "If the bug or feature is fixed by a PR that is not associated with your proposal, the contributor is not eligible for compensation unless they can find the PR that fixed it and prove their porposal preceded the one associated with the PR." to "If the bug or feature is fixed by a PR that is not associated with your proposal, then you will not be eligible for the associated compensation unless you can find the PR that fixed it and that yours preceded that one."
Added changes from Dylan's suggestions
Fixed!
Updated!
Added but made a tiny tweak. |
Ah yeah, so line 55 basically makes it seem like you have to report the bug and propose a solution to get the reporting bonus, but to my knowledge I thought they could just report the bug and get the bonus and not need to provide a potential solution! |
@Julesssss this should be good to finalize today, once https://github.com/Expensify/Expensify/issues/241611 is finalized. If this is complete after you are offline, should I just remove you and re-assign pullerbear? |
Thanks for no scoping this PR @nathanmetcalf 🎯. |
@michaelhaxhiu is this still on hold? |
Yes still on hold while Slack support gives us hell 🔥 |
Let's not deploy it quite yet. Sorry this is... ad tedium |
Let's do this thing now, just got unblocked and ready to proceed. |
@michaelhaxhiu looks like this was merged without the checklist test passing. Please add a note explaining why this was done and remove the |
✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release. |
It's live |
🚀 Deployed to staging by @michaelhaxhiu in version: 1.2.27-0 🚀
|
🚀 Deployed to production by @roryabraham in version: 1.2.27-4 🚀
|
🚀 Deployed to production by @roryabraham in version: 1.2.27-4 🚀
|
cc @JmillsExpensify @mallenexpensify
Details
Ask Questions
header to beSlack Channels
Fixed Issues
https://github.com/Expensify/Expensify/issues/240113